How to advance sustainable development
Participate in Rio+Solutions, a global conversation about the key challenges expected to feature prominently at Rio+20, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development June 20-22, 2012.
American Red Cross - Haiti Delegation | Apply By 10 February 2012
TERMS OF REFERENCE:
Design, review and implementation of
Participatory community assessments
In Port au Prince, Haiti
January - May 2012
Following the January 12th 2010 earthquake,Haitihas experienced tremendous difficulties in its recovery, especially in urban and densely populated neighborhoods known as slums. In order to allow the affected population to return to safe homes, it is necessary to address their diverse needs more effectively and efficiently, through an integrated approach encompassing shelter, water and sanitation, health, disaster risk reduction and livelihoods issues.
The American Red Cross (ARC) is developing a program that will focus on the reconstruction and upgrading of Baillergeau andCampeche, two neighborhoods of Carrefour Feuilles, aPort-au-Princedistrict characterized by a high destruction rate, multiple risks due to steep slopes and ravines, limited or non-existent basic urban services and a low-income population.
A first phase of this program (“Phase 1”) has been planned to gather information, build partnerships and mobilize communities, over a period of two months. Working together with the national and local government, international organizations, community organizations and residents is a key to success. Phase 1 will also be the occasion to acquire a deeper knowledge of the physical, environmental, economic, social and legal context in the area thanks to joint assessment work led by ARC program staff and consultants. Results from Phase 1 will be used to inform the development of the ARC’s longer term Integrated Neighborhood Reconstruction and Recovery Program.
During Phase 1, ARC will conduct the following assessments:
By way of these Terms of Reference, ARC seeks an experienced consultant/firm in order to contextualize, adapt, develop and apply urban participatory community assessment tools and methodologies in order to collect information that will inform an Integrated Neighborhood Approach program. Information Needs and Tools for the Participatory Assessment (Health, DRR, Livelihoods, Shelter, Water & Sanitation, and Social Dynamics) provides an overview of the anticipated needs and tools to conduct this assessment in Port au Prince, Haiti.
ARC will conduct participatory vulnerability and capacity assessments in urban communities, in order to ensure community participation throughout the program cycle. Community-based programs, as well as community-based participatory tools such as Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (VCA), Community Based Health and First Aid (CBHFA), Participatory Hygiene and Sanitation Transformation (PHAST), Participatory Approach To Safe Shelter Awareness (PASSA), are not new to the global Red Cross network; however, they have not been previously applied in an integrated fashion in urban communities inHaiti.
The ARC intends to conduct training for its staff on how to apply finalized assessment tools, and to carry out participatory assessments in targeted urban communities in order to develop an integrated program proposal.
As mentioned above, in addition to the participatory community assessments, ARC will also carry out sector specific technical assessments (technical baseline survey) and enumerations (for the shelter program). ARC will work to ensure there is adequate coherence and coordination between these various assessments.
An external consultant, firm or group of consultants are sought to lead the design and implementation of participatory community assessments in targeted urban communities inHaiti. The scope of work includes the following:
The main purpose of this consultancy is to contextualize, adapt and/or develop and apply participatory assessment tools and methodologies in communities in two targeted urban neighborhoods in Haiti (Baillergeau and Campeche), in order to inform the development of an Integrated Neighborhood Approach program; this work will ensure community participation, identify community needs and adhere to ARC standards and best practice.
The consultant(s) will be responsible for the following deliverables over an anticipated period of two months. Specific deadlines will be determined through discussion with the consultant:
Using a participatory process, the consultant(s) will conduct training on implementing participatory assessments in urban communities for 15-20 ARC field staff using learning-by-doing training techniques. Trained field staff will be deployed to the two targeted neighborhoods to carry out participatory community assessments along with community representatives. The consultant(s) will coordinate the assessment process and supervise and support the assessment teams in order to ensure community participation and the quality, consistency and credibility of assessment results
The consultant(s) will be expected to undertake the following activities:
Step 1: Review secondary information (including ACT assessment)
Step 2: Develop, contextualize and/or adapt existing ARC participatory tools and methodologies, based on information needs presented in Annex 1a
Step 3: Develop a contextualized training curriculum
Step 4: Conduct participatory assessment skill development training for 15-20 ARC field staff
Step 5: Create 3-4 teams from trained field staff
Step 6: Supervise each team as they carry out participatory assessments and community action planning (each team to cover 1-2 communities; each community to be assessed over a period of 10 days)
Step 7: Facilitate the development of a community action plan in each of the 4-5 communities within the two targeted neighborhoods (Bailergeau andCampeche),
Step 8: Draft and finalize report with findings of the participatory assessments and with the community action plans
The participatory assessment process and outcomes are to be coordinated with the other assessments listed above. In particular, the consultant(s) will need to closely coordinate and share information with the mapping team and GIS consultant/s as this team will be developing a profile of the targeted neighborhoods.
|
Who are the users? |
How to use of the assessment report? |
How to disseminate? |
|
Targeted communities (where assessments are carried out) |
- To develop community action plans - To use as advocacy & coordination tool with governmental and non-governmental agencies - To use as a basis for community development (linking with development plan) |
- Community meetings - Provide printed copies of assessments and community action plan - Prepare flex-chart of key findings and community action plan |
|
ARC-Haiti Country team |
- Findings and data will be fed into the program proposal (logframe, work plan and budgeting) - Monitoring and evaluation of the program |
- Submit the report to Assessment Manager - Organize half-day workshop |
|
Haitian Red Cross |
- Programming and monitoring - To use as an advocacy coordination tool with governmental and non-governmental agencies |
- Circulate soft and hard copies of the report to the HRC - Provide briefing to the HRC management and technical team |
|
ARC-NHQ |
- A basis for technical review of the proposal document - Document of the entire process for knowledge management and replication of good practice - Monitoring and evaluation of the program |
- Assessment Manager to submit the report to HAP and Program Integration - Draft a summary capturing the key learning of the entire process - Upload report to ARC’s server and webpage |
|
IFRC and Participating National Societies |
- Knowledge management and replication of good practices |
- Circulate soft copy of the report to the IFRC and PNS - Provide briefing to the IFRC, PNS (Haiti) management and technical team - Update to Red Cross movement and operation meeting |
|
Governmental agencies ( municipality , Departments, DPC and other relevant line ministry |
- To use as a basis for community development (linking with development plan) |
- Involve the governmental agencies, community organization, schools etc. in the participatory assessment process - Provide printed copies of assessments and community action plan (French version ) along with briefing notes |
|
Other agencies ( donor communities , UN agencies , INGOs) |
- Knowledge management and replication of good practices - To use as advocacy, coordination and development tool |
- Circulate soft copy of the report to the report along with a briefing note. |
All collected data will be the sole property of the American Red Cross and its dissemination will be done only by the American Red Cross. The consultant/firm may not use the data for their own research purposes, nor license the data to be used by others, without the written consent of the American Red Cross.
|
Key activities |
Timeline (indicative) |
|
8.1 Post TOR |
Date TBD |
|
8.2 Deadline for proposals |
10 working days after posting (ARC) |
|
8.3 Selection of consultant(s)/firm and contract |
7 working days (ARC) |
|
8.4 Arrival of the consultant(s)/firm |
Date TBD |
|
8.5 Secondary information review (from ACT assessment) |
7 working days for tasks 8.5, 8.6 and 8.7 |
|
8.6 Participate in briefing meetings with ARC, IFRC, HRC and other relevant key stakeholders |
|
|
8.7 Collect and compile participatory tools and reference materials |
|
|
8.8 Design work plan |
1 working day |
|
8.9 Contextualized participatory (urban) community assessment tools |
5 working days |
|
8.10 Pre-testing of tools |
3 working days |
|
8.11 Training curriculum on participatory community assessment |
5 working days (concurrent with 8.9) |
|
8.12 Facilitate training (learning by doing for 15-20 participants ) |
7 working days |
|
8.13 Facilitate community assessments |
10 working days |
|
8.14 Community Action Plans (2 neighborhoods, 4-5 urban communities |
5 working days (concurrent with 8.13) |
|
8.15 Synthesis of community action plans to feed to ARC longer-term plan and draft assessment report |
5 working days |
|
8.16 ARC Feedback on community action plan and assessment report |
5 working days (ARC) |
|
8.17 Finalization of assessment report |
3 working days |
|
Total working days for the consultancy |
41 working days + travel days |
The assessment will require a consultant with strong participatory research skills and extensive experience in qualitative data collection in post-disaster urban development settings.
Qualifications – Required:
- Extensive experience and proven track record in the design and implementation of community-based programming, particularly in an urban and/or post disaster recovery context in developing countries
- Demonstrated expertise in qualitative data collection and analysis
- Demonstrated experience in training for participatory assessments (VCA, CBFHA, PRA)
- Fluency in English and French required
Qualifications – Preferred:
- Professional work experience in Haiti
- Post graduate degree from a recognized institution relating to community development, social research or social sciences
- Red Cross experience
Please note: The participatory assessment process and outcomes are linked with other assessments and the ARC is also seeking consultants or firms to prepare a map and geospatial profile of the targeted area and to establish a plan to reconstruct the neighborhood. The TOR for this consultancy will be posted separately. Consultants and firms who have expertise in both are encouraged to apply for both assignments.
Negotiable.
The consultant/firm will report to the designated Assessment Manager.
Obligations of the Consultant(s)/Firm
Obligations of the Assessment Manager
Obligations of the Sector Leads
Obligations of NHQ Technical Team
Obligations of the HAP Management
Standard evaluation and survey methodologies and good practices utilized in the international humanitarian community should be applied. Such resources should include but are not limited to those promulgated by the Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. In particular, all findings and conclusions should be based on evidence or reasoning which is presented in the assessment report.
It is expected that the collection of information will adhere to ethical guidelines [as outlined in the American Evaluation Association’s Guiding Principles for Evaluators. A summary of these guidelines is provided below, and a more detailed description can be found at www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesPrintable.asp. These all apply to any assessment:
The following is a list of some reference materials will be available to the selected consultant:
- ARC strategic plan (2011-2015) including sector specific plans
- ARC Concept note of integrated programming
- ARC program proposal (phase –I) on integrated programming
- ALNAP Lessons RESPONDING TO URBAN DISASTERS, Learning from previous relief and recovery operations, www.alnap.org
- ALNAP , Haiti Earthquake Response, Context Analysis July 2010
- Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC): Urban disasters – lessons from Haiti, March 2011
- Education Cluster - Rapid Joint Needs Assessment (RJNA) Haiti Earthquake 2010, RJNA Final Report L. Bender 15 March 2010
- Empowering Haiti to Build a Better Future, United Nations Development Program (UNDP) , March 2010
- Haiti Earthquake PDNA-2010: Assessment of damage, losses, general and sectoral needs
- Independent Evaluation Group. World Bank Group Response to the Haiti Earthquake: Evaluative Lessons. World Bank, IFC, MIGA. 2010. http://www.alnap.org/pool/files/ALNAPLessonsEarthquakes.pdf
- IFRC, VCA publications ( tools , manuals )
- IFRC, CBFHA tools
- IFRC, PASSA publications
- IFRC, World Disaster Report (2010)
- Oxfam Briefing Paper “Haiti: A Once-in-a Century Chance for Change”, Beyond reconstruction: re-envisioning Haiti with equity, fairness, and opportunity, Oxfam International, March 2010
- WWF publication ( environment assessment tools
- Other relevant publications on participatory planning
[1] ACT has conducted an assessment in Baillergeau and the preliminary findings were presented to the American Red Cross in November 2011. The assessment was mainly focus on urban planning; community needs in terms of Health, DRR and the other components presented in Annex 1a were mainly missing from the ACT assessment.
Information need and tools for the participatory Assessment
Table below present the tool recommended and a tentative list of information to be collected during participatory assessment.
|
Tools |
Health* |
Disaster Risk Reduction |
WatSan |
Shelter |
Environment |
General |
|
Direct Observation |
Health Infrastructure Availability/ |
Hazard |
Condition of WatSan infrastructure |
Degree of destruction Living condition Existing urban fabric, links and functionality in relation to other parts of the cities |
Identify key environmental issues |
Access Condition of children |
|
Community Mapping Hazard/Risk Maps Capacity Resource Map Problem Maps Transect Maps
|
Health infrastructure
Social gathering spots
Entertainment spots/hotspots for HIV |
Evacuation area Water reservoir, tanks
|
Access to water Drainages Disease prevalent area Ravines, and its state.
|
Organization offices All houses with its color code from MTPTC assessment
|
Waste management Debris distribution Risks and illegal constructions Public perception on environmental issues |
Public infrastructure Slope (geographical situation) CAMPS and informal settlement Trees
|
|
Seasonal Calendar |
Epidemics Rainy seasons Large community gatherings (holidays, etc) |
Access to water Water sources Hurricane, flooding, |
|
|
Storm water/flash floods/ floods/ Landslides/ Ravine flow rates |
Labor migration Festivals Climate patterns Busy period |
|
Historical Profile, Historical Population |
Mortality, morbidity Availability and quality of health infrastructure |
Land slides Hazard History and scale of disasters
|
Availability of water per capita Competition for resources |
Construction of houses (quality and quantity) |
Same as DRR/ WatSan
|
Demographic changes History of organizations working there Red cross involvement Conflicts, unrest |
|
Focus Group Discussion |
General health knowledge, attitudes and behaviors
Availability/access to health commodities |
Perception about vulnerability
|
Perception about solid waste Sustainability of water supply Water availability and accessibility and perception of quality Sanitation acceptable methods |
How do they see construction of Houses
|
Perception about environment Same as WatSan/ DRR/ Health
|
Environment |
|
Semi structure interview - KI
Community leaders, stake holders |
Mortality/morbidity data from facilities/MSPP
|
|
Water economy |
Real estate projects affecting the area and its surroundings |
Perception about environment
|
These will be also guided by information collected during FGD
|
|
Semi structure interview – HH |
Health related Knowledge, attitudes and practices |
Awareness about DP measures |
|
|
|
These will be also guided by information collected during FGD |
|
Community/organization network analysis/stake holder analysis |
Which health related CBOs are present ? What they are doing? Resources? Community perception about organizations
|
Community perception about organization |
|
|
Environmental projects / organizations |
Dynamics, capacity, how long they are working, SWOT, conflicts, Governance, institutions, actors and projects in the area |
|
Mapping of socio-economic factors at the community level |
|
|
To be determined by consultant/s |
The consultant/s will conduct a socio-economic mapping in 14 camps and 5 neighborhoods in Carrefour Feuilles, to generate an understanding of key socio-economic factors at the community level, such as the following:
|
|
Social Dynamics Assessment |
|
|
To be determined by consultants |
The Consultant will study the 14 camps and 5 neighborhoods in Carrefour Feuilles on different levels, including: Identity: definition of urban community, identification of forces that federate groups, district and neighborhood’s history, places of interest, personalities, names and meaning, traditions as well as population’s values, religion, origin, lifestyle, main occupation, relationship with other neighborhoods… Institutions and organizations: analysis of active groups in Carrefour Feuilles (political, religious, professional, educational, age-related, gender-related…) and their purpose, size, budget, strength and weaknesses and how they can participate in ARC’s program. Assessment of Government organizations (PNH[1], ASEC[2], CASEC[3]…) and NGOs, especially their scope of work, their image and results. |
*watsan related information will also be relevant for health
[1] Haiti National Police
[2] Communal Section Assembly
[3] Communal Section Council
How to Apply:
Detailed CVs of the professional(s) who will work on the consultancy. If more than one consultant is proposed, please attach a table describing the level of effort (in number of days) of each team member in each of the consultancy activities.
Daily Rate: Please mention the expected daily rate in USD.