AusAID-Solomon Islands Partnership

Solomon Islands flag. Photo by: Julie Lyn / CC BY

Plagued by weak governance, high poverty rates and recurring social unrest, Solomon Islands currently is the biggest recipient of Australian official development assistance in the Pacific. The former British protectorate, which the United Nations still classifies a least developed country, has a predominantly rural population with 87 percent of citizens residing in the countryside and subsisting mainly on small-holder agricultural production. Foreign assistance has played a front-line role in the country’s development efforts, with ODA still being a key funding source for its government.

Having a primary commodity-based economy means the country is reliant on imports of manufactured goods. Timber has long been Solomon Islands’ main export, but heavy deforestation due to logging has prompted a conscious shift to other abundant resources: both foreign firms and donors have channeled their investments to boosting cocoa, copra and palm oil production, along with gold mining operations. Government policy itself is focused on ensuring food security for the local populace, although it has recognized agriculture as the likely basis for broad-based sustainable growth. Meanwhile, the high cost of imported fuel drives the preference for renewable energy sources, with the state and its bilateral donors supporting initiatives to develop minihydro, solar, wind power and biofuel systems.

The central government, whose current structure was established with intensive foreign intervention, especially by Australia, remains institutionally fragile. For many citizens, governance is still most felt at the village level, where highly autonomous communities — roughly 5,000 of them dispersed across islands — take charge of their own territorial affairs.

The country’s highly volcanic islands make it prone to frequent earthquakes, tsunamis and typhoons — disasters which, along with the occasional eruption of social tension, tend to negate the progress made by previous development programs. This vulnerability has been taken into account by donors, whose projects, particularly in infrastructure and security, have in recent years been centered on reducing the socio-economic impact of conflicts and natural calamities.

This article is for Devex Members

For full access to the content of the article sign in or join Devex.

About the author

  • Devexlogo d 226

    Devex Editor

    Thanks a lot for your interest in Devex News. To share news and views, story ideas and press releases, please email We look forward to hearing from you.