• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • News
    • Development Assistance

    EU aid departments vie for resources in Afghanistan

    Some say the Taliban's swift takeover has exposed the EU's inability to react to crises outside government structures.

    By Vince Chadwick // 26 November 2021
    People walking at the streets of Kabul, Afghanistan. Photo by: Fardin Waezi / UNAMA / Latin America News Agency via Reuters Connect

    Divisions are emerging on the European Union’s aid strategy in Afghanistan, as the humanitarian and development departments tussle over when and how to help the population of 40 million people.

    The two directorates have vastly different global budgets through 2027 — €11.5 billion ($13 billion) for the humanitarian arm European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations, or ECHO, compared to around €74 billion for development at the newly renamed department for International Partnerships, or INTPA. The latter had set aside around €1 billion for Afghanistan for the next seven years, but it froze all development support through the government when the Taliban swept to power in August.

    “The one thing we do have [in Afghanistan] is development funding — and I'm not sure we are showing the urgency around this that we should.”

    — Barry Andrews, an Irish liberal member of the European Parliament

    In October, the EU announced around €1 billion support package to the country, including €300 million for humanitarian needs through ECHO, and €250 million for “humanitarian plus” work overseen by INTPA, including paying the salaries of teachers and nurses via the United Nations. The rest will be allocated by INTPA at a later date, keeping some funding in reserve for reconstruction and other needs.

    “We also want to keep this around €400 million to €500 million in our pockets and also follow the [developments] and then decide how to allocate the rest of the funding,” Jutta Urpilainen, the EU commissioner responsible for development policy, told the European Parliament earlier this month. She added that this could either go to Afghanistan or to neighboring countries to deal with migration, terrorism, organized crime, and human trafficking.

    That prompted Niamh nic Carthaigh, director of EU policy and advocacy at the International Rescue Committee, to warn against “any diversion of humanitarian funds to bolster neighbouring states’ border capacity or to prevent onward migration from the region,” she wrote in an email to Devex.

    With an estimated 22.8 million people facing crisis levels of food insecurity in the coming months, some argue that now is not the time to hold back resources. “We urge the EU and other major donors to take all steps necessary to unlock all available funding and urgently facilitate the flow of aid to where it’s most needed on the ground,” Smriti Singh, deputy South Asia director at Amnesty International, told Devex by email Thursday.  

    Janez Lenarčič, the humanitarian aid commissioner, told Devex last Friday that questions over why money remained under INTPA’s control, rather than being transferred to ECHO for quick disbursement, should not be addressed to him.

    “We [ECHO] do what we can with the funds that we have,” he said. “And the funds that we have are the funds that are budgeted plus any transfer that we receive.”

    At the same time, Lenarčič acknowledged, “we can take all the money that anybody is willing to give us and it will still not be enough given the needs.”

    Lenarčič was absent from Urpilainen’s appearance at the Parliament’s development committee this month, where she portrayed humanitarian-plus as “a narrow corridor or path of intervention that goes beyond purely life-saving humanitarian aid but does not mean regular development support.”

    “In practice, we will be implementing the humanitarian-development nexus,” she told members of the European Parliament, adding that humanitarian-plus spending, which will be overseen by her department, would focus on areas such as health, education, and nutrition.

    However, working with international organizations to implement this novel approach will likely take months, not the weeks ECHO says it would need to roll out any extra resources it received. Asked about that discrepancy last Friday, Lenarčič answered simply: “Yes, you’re right.”

    The daylight between the positions of the two commissioners is being noticed. “I want to know from Lenarčič where he sits on this [humanitarian-plus],” Barry Andrews, an Irish liberal member of the European Parliament, told Devex in his office recently. “I want to see the two of them making joint statements about this. I want to identify that Lenarčič is comfortable with this initiative. And I want them to use it symbolically to sell the nexus idea.”

    Andrews, a former minister of state for children and head of the Irish charity GOAL, said the EU’s aid architecture — with the greater-resourced INTPA unable to support hostile governments in the likes of Ethiopia and Afghanistan, and the cash-strapped though purely humanitarian ECHO — left Brussels with few options in times of crisis.

    “The one thing we do have [in Afghanistan] is development funding — and I'm not sure we are showing the urgency around this that we should,” Andrews said, dismissing the “tiny” €9.53 billion cushion designed to respond to unforeseen crises between now and 2027, “What is needed is further funding from the development pot in Afghanistan very urgently.”

    As for humanitarian-plus, Andrews said it should be scrutinized by the European Parliament as though it were a new instrument. “What we have instead is the occasional presence of the commissioner … releasing information in one-and-a-half pages,” he said. “It's just not good enough … I’m not even sure what the modalities are. There’s nothing written down, we're getting it live and in person. In fairness, most of the development committee members find it very hard to follow what's going on.”

    More reading:

    ► EU weighs restarting development work in Afghanistan, avoiding Taliban

    ► EU debates Afghan aid, potential refugee policy

    ► EU, Germany cut off development aid to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan

    • Funding
    • Humanitarian Aid
    • Institutional Development
    • Afghanistan
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).

    About the author

    • Vince Chadwick

      Vince Chadwickvchadw

      Vince Chadwick is a contributing reporter at Devex. A law graduate from Melbourne, Australia, he was social affairs reporter for The Age newspaper, before covering breaking news, the arts, and public policy across Europe, including as a reporter and editor at POLITICO Europe. He was long-listed for International Journalist of the Year at the 2023 One World Media Awards.

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    European UnionIs the political environment in Brussels the worst ever for NGOs?

    Is the political environment in Brussels the worst ever for NGOs?

    European UnionUS Paris pullout ‘good’ for European firms, says EU development chief

    US Paris pullout ‘good’ for European firms, says EU development chief

    Devex Pro InsiderDevex Pro Insider: The fight to save USAID begins

    Devex Pro Insider: The fight to save USAID begins

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: EU debates filling US aid void

    Devex Newswire: EU debates filling US aid void

    Most Read

    • 1
      How to use law to strengthen public health advocacy
    • 2
      House cuts US global education funding 20%, spares multilateral partners
    • 3
      Lasting nutrition and food security needs new funding — and new systems
    • 4
      Opinion: The pursuit of remission — from possibility to priority
    • 5
      The power of diagnostics to improve mental health
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement