• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • News
    • Development assistance

    OECD-DAC members unable to reach a consensus on private sector instruments

    After years of talks, members of the OECD Development Assistance Committee are still unable to finalize comprehensive reporting rules for spending aid money through private sector instruments.

    By Sophie Edwards // 13 December 2018
    Empty seats at the OECD headquarters in Paris, France. Photo by: Andrew Wheeler / OECD

    LONDON — After four years of negotiations, the world’s top donors have been unable to agree a set of permanent rules on how to count aid money spent through private channels as official development assistance.

    The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Development Assistance Committee — the body tasked with setting the rules around ODA for its members — released a statement on Wednesday revealing that despite years of talks, members could not reach a comprehensive set of rules on how to report aid spent through private sector instruments such as loans, guarantees, and equity.

    “This risks undermining the very concept of ODA itself. We are likely to see a shift with more ODA being spent to mobilize the private sector … more subsidies to the private sector and ... less aid money going to the public and social sectors.”

    — Samantha Attridge, senior research fellow, the Overseas Development Institute

    Instead, DAC member countries — including 30 of the world’s richest countries which collectively account for about 80 percent of global aid spending — did agree to a set of five provisional reporting arrangements. These will be reviewed in 2021 unless permanent rules are agreed in the meantime, according to the statement.

    The news comes on the heels of other disagreements within DAC, including over tied aid, a decision on which was delayed by Japan, and threats from the United Kingdom that it could break with DAC rules over several issues this year.

    The private sector instrument negotiations are part of a broader reform process started in 2012 to update the concept of ODA and incorporate new flows, activities, and instruments into the official aid reporting systems. The work to develop private sector instrument rules, which started in earnest in 2014, was intended to incentivize donors to use ODA funds to crowd-in additional private finance for development.

    But civil society groups have long warned that without strict rules, ODA could be used to subsidize private sector investments and lead to a decrease in overall aid effectiveness.

    They described the just-published provisional agreement as a “weak stop-gap arrangement” which could leave the door open for donors to report their private sector instrument spending however they want.

    “Donors have an obligation to make sure that every single euro spent on development aid achieves maximum impact in the fight against poverty and inequality. Scarce aid funds must not be diverted into private schemes, and away from where they are needed most,” Polly Meeks, senior policy and advocacy officer at Eurodad, told Devex.

    Meeks also said that tighter rules are needed to avoid ODA funds becoming a “back-door subsidy for companies in donor countries,” and a way of “tying” aid.

    However, not everyone was critical of the stopgap agreement. Officials speaking to the media on the condition of anonymity, said that it was better than nothing in the short term and the fact that donors agreed to additional steps on “transparency, additionality, and reporting” was positive. These will give DAC more detailed information about how donors are using private sector instruments and this data can be used to help build an evidence base to inform future negotiations on reporting private sector instruments, they said.

    The fact that the total amount of private sector instruments will now be shown separately in ODA statistics is another positive step, according to Julie Seghers, OECD policy and advocacy adviser at Oxfam.

    One of the major problems with the new provisions is that they allow for two different ways of counting loans, Samantha Attridge, a senior research fellow at the Overseas Development Institute, told Devex.

    Under the just-published interim guidelines, loans and equities made to commercial entities will be counted on a cash-flow basis, but sovereign loans will be reported on a grant-equivalent basis. This inconsistency could create “perverse incentives,” Attridge said, and potentially lead to more aid going to support the private sector over public sector programs. It could also lead to more ODA money being spent in middle-income countries, where it is easier to invest, she said.

    Attridge also warned that the proposed way of measuring the development impact of money spent through development finance institutions to determine eligibility is too simplistic since it looks only at the countries in which the investments are made and not at the quality and impact of those investments.

    “All combined, this risks undermining the very concept of ODA itself. We are likely to see a shift with more ODA being spent to mobilize the private sector … more subsidies to the private sector and ... less aid money going to the public and social sectors,” Attridge said.

    But aid experts are also concerned about what the DAC provisional guidelines do not say. No mention is made about how to report guarantees and there is also nothing on a lock-in period or other safeguards intended to prevent donors from switching accounting methods and potentially double counting their ODA contributions.

    Civil society organizations now say they want DAC members to reopen the negotiations and put tighter rules in place.

    “The effective use of aid money is too important to let slide. Donor countries must get back to the negotiating table and work with developing countries and civil society to put strongest possible safeguards in place,” Oxfam’s Seghers said.

    The OECD-DAC had no comment.

    More reading on OECD:

    ► Exclusive: Meet the new OECD-DAC chair

    ► OECD pushes fix on untied aid, Japan pushes back

    ► OECD calls for overhaul of the development finance system

    • Funding
    • Private Sector
    • Economic Development
    • Banking & Finance
    • Worldwide
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).

    About the author

    • Sophie Edwards

      Sophie Edwards

      Sophie Edwards is a Devex Contributing Reporter covering global education, water and sanitation, and innovative financing, along with other topics. She has previously worked for NGOs, and the World Bank, and spent a number of years as a journalist for a regional newspaper in the U.K. She has a master's degree from the Institute of Development Studies and a bachelor's from Cambridge University.

    Search for articles

    Related Jobs

    • Technical Advisor on Sustainable Coffee
      Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | Ethiopia | Eastern Africa
    • Financial Officer - Operational Finance
      Brussels, Belgium | Belgium | Western Europe
    • Finance Coordinator (Fixed-Term)
      Kabul, Afghanistan | Afghanistan | Central Asia
    • See more

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 2
      FCDO's top development contractors in 2024/25
    • 3
      Strengthening health systems by measuring what really matters
    • 4
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 5
      Reigniting momentum for maternal, newborn, and child health

    Trending

    Financing for Development Conference

    The Trump Effect

    Newsletters

    Related Stories

    Development AssistanceOECD nations ignore call to curb raiding of aid budgets for refugees

    OECD nations ignore call to curb raiding of aid budgets for refugees

    Development FinanceOECD's Carsten Staur says we're 'at the brink of a new paradigm'

    OECD's Carsten Staur says we're 'at the brink of a new paradigm'

    Development FinanceIn 2024, global aid fell for the first time in five years

    In 2024, global aid fell for the first time in five years

    Inclusive DevelopmentA response by OECD’s Carsten Staur to civil society open letter of June 3

    A response by OECD’s Carsten Staur to civil society open letter of June 3

    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement
    We use cookies to help improve your user experience. By using our site, you agree to the terms of our Privacy Policy.