Opinion: Bring budgets center-stage to achieve green growth in Bangladesh

A view of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Photo by: ASaber91 / CC BY

Bangladesh has sustained a GDP growth rate of over 6 percent for more than decade. The impending graduation out of the Least Developed Countries category is a remarkable achievement for the country of 160 million people, only in its fifth decade as an independent nation.

This growth trajectory has brought in its wake several key challenges on the environment front — unchecked extraction of scarce natural resources, environmental degradation, population pressure, climate-related vulnerabilities, to name a few. Bangladesh is one of the lowest ranked countries in the global Environmental Performance Index prepared by the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. In the 2018 report, Bangladesh ranks 179 out of 180 countries. Studies have shown that Bangladesh loses about 1 percent of its GDP due to the harmful effects of air pollution alone.

This has in turn put pressure on policymakers to ensure that growth strategies are sustainable. A key element of sustainability is a green growth path, which is not only expected to limit the damage to the environment, but actually enhance productivity of the natural capital stock.

In a country where the poor remain heavily reliant on natural resources, an equitable or inclusive growth agenda needs to take on a decidedly “green” hue, following the path of green growth. In 2014, the government of Bangladesh produced a Climate Fiscal Framework, primarily to highlight how the government prioritizes climate action in its budgeting and implementation. While Bangladesh has been proactive in highlighting the risks posed by climate change on low-lying areas, and is widely recognized as a leading voice globally, it needs to widen its priorities to include tackling the challenges posed by its environmentally unsustainable growth trajectory.

A concrete step toward recognizing the importance of green growth is to begin reflecting it in the way Bangladesh allocates its finances. This essentially refers to reforms to the Public Financial Management systems — the budget cycle from strategic planning to oversight.

Public finances must be managed in a way that ensures more effective and efficient allocation and expenditure on green-growth issues. When policy options are being analyzed, one should factor in the value of natural capital inputs, and determine how it is factored into the deliberations. Reforming public procurement practices to ensure they reward green business practices is another important aspect.

Both emerging and advanced economies use green fiscal policies to promote green growth. Many governments have introduced environmental taxes, which charge particular groups to pay for environmental damage, incentivize them to change their behavior, and also provide additional revenues for government spending. Such measures might include fuel or carbon duties, congestion charges, or waste/landfill taxes. These measures focus on the expansion of fiscal space and increasing available resources for environmental or green growth purposes.

In Bangladesh, these options remain underdeveloped, and more work is urgently required so that policymakers have a list of viable policy proposals from which to choose from in the formulation of environmental and fiscal policies. In our recent paper, “Greening Public Financial Management for Sustainable Development: A Green Fiscal Framework for Bangladesh,” authored by Bushra Ferdous Khan, we offer suggestions on how principles of environmental conservation and sustainable use of natural capital can be embedded in, and delivered through Bangladesh’s PFM system.

A running theme in any reforms process is the capacity of those who are responsible for authorizing the changes, and of those who are responsible for implementing them. It is critical to ensure that the reform proposals are situated within Bangladesh’s broader political priorities. For example, would an agenda pushing the country to go green succeed if it were positioned against the priorities of wealth creation? The key to this is to avoid the perception of this being a zero-sum game. And indeed, there are long-term benefits from a green economy, as that would mean that natural capital inputs of a higher quality remain available for future generations.

Global research that demonstrates this link must be made available to policymakers as they set reform priorities.

Those responsible for implementing reforms also face constraints in terms of knowledge and skills. This is an area where technical assistance by bilateral or multilateral aid agencies can play a role. Supporting the development of specialized (and localized) technical knowledge, and the promotion of international knowledge networks can be a mechanism to help the government.

Development priorities set at the highest levels of government find their way to the ground through an elaborate administrative process. Those working on public sector reforms should therefore focus not only on policy commitments, but also (crucially) on the nuts and bolts of governance. The budget cycle of a country is one of the most prominent examples of the latter, and an area where there are significant opportunities for reform. The time to act is now.

The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

About the author

  • Suvojit Chattopadhyay

    Suvojit Chattopadhyay is Bangladesh country manager of Adam Smith International. ASI manages the Economic Dialogue for Green Growth, a UK Aid-funded research and advocacy program in Bangladesh.