• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • News
    • News

    The QDDR Pre-Release: Good Intent but the Devil’s in the Details

    Connie Veillette shares what she considers as laudable and worrying aspects of the leaked summary of the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review’s recommendations.

    By Devex Editor // 19 November 2010

    EDITOR’S NOTE: Connie Veillette, director of the Center for Global Development’s Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance initiative, commends the draft Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review report for its emphasis on rebuilding the U.S. Agency for International Development and putting the agency at the helm of new development initiatives. But she questions the draft QDDR’s endorsement of having U.S. domestic agencies engaged in international efforts and focusing U.S. investments on areas where the country has comparative advantage in.

    With the unofficial release of a consultation document on the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), we now have further indications of what will be in the final version scheduled for official release in December.  Until we see the final product, it is difficult to know if some of the laudable rhetoric surrounding the role of development and USAID will be matched by the concrete steps needed to turn it into reality.  As they say, the devil is in the details.

    I like the emphasis on finding greater efficiencies, rebuilding USAID, and putting USAID in charge of new initiatives, but the jury is still out on whether the document will go far enough or how much of this will be implemented.  It is also clear that even after nearly 18 months in the making, some difficult decisions are being punted for more study.  Even so, there are numerous points worthy of applause, and an equal number that are areas of concern.

    Here’s what I like, together with some related concerns:

    • Commitment to Reform.  A commitment to “right-size and institutionalize reform” indicates a drive toward efficiency and matching the right resources with challenges.  Does institutionalizing reform signal a move toward writing new legislation as a framework for development and diplomacy?  If not, will many of these changes survive into a new administration or even under a different Secretary of State?

    • The Two Ds in Action.  The document states that “diplomacy and development must be mutually reinforcing.”  This assertion sounds a whole lot better than previous statements supporting the “integration” of diplomacy and development.  But, I am still left wondering if this adequately recognizes the distinctiveness between the two disciplines, each with their own timelines and rhythms.

    • Personnel.  The commitment to continue rebuilding personnel, through USAID’s Development Leadership Initiative, recognizing the unique role of Foreign Service Nationals to development work, and providing both diplomats and development experts with the tools they need to accomplish their missions is welcome news.

    • New Development Initiatives.  I applaud the decision to put USAID in charge of the Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative and eventually the Global Health Initiative.  Food security and health are core development functions that need to be led by a development, rather than a diplomatic, agency.  What does this mean for the idea of appointing a Global Food Security Coordinator?  Will the Global AIDS Coordinator position, currently at State, be moved over to USAID?

    • Joint Strategies.  Prioritizing joint State and USAID strategic planning here and in the field will help to achieve complementarity between diplomacy and development.  It will also serve as useful exercises for Chiefs of Missions to fully appreciate all the various aspects of civilian power.

    Here are some issues that give me discomfort, either outright or for what they may imply:

    • Whole of Government.  The document accepts, perhaps even embraces, the whole-of-government approach without any apparent questioning of its appropriateness.  Do its benefits (access to a wider range of expertise) outweigh its dangers (the difficulty of achieving effective coordination here and in the field)?  If such a discussion occurred and the decision was made that WoG is better than consolidation, then where is the framework that would guide determining which agencies should be doing what activities and under what circumstances?  And, what agency will be guiding the interagency process?

    • Role of Domestic Agencies.  Similarly, the endorsement of having U.S. domestic agencies engaged in international activities poses serious consequences for policy sustainability.  All domestic agencies are heavily influenced by their own domestic constituencies.  When those agencies take on international missions, it means that domestic constituencies, often with rather limited interests, can drive the purpose of international activities to serve domestic purposes.  One has only to look at U.S. food aid programs to understand how their design serves the interests of U.S. farmers and shippers with the consequence that food aid is more costly and less responsive than it needs to be.

    • Focus on Comparative Advantage.  The intent is to “concentrate programming by focusing investments in areas in which we have a comparative advantage.”  I’m all for focusing on what we do well, but these areas (Sustainable Economic Growth, Democracy and Governance, Food Security, Global Health, Climate Change, and Humanitarian Assistance) strike me as broad objectives and leave me to wonder what are the areas in which we will be decreasing our investments.

    • Chiefs of Mission as CEOs.  The concept of empowering chiefs of missions as CEOs sounds good, but because the overwhelming majority of those CEOs come from State’s diplomatic ranks, there will have to be a cultural rethinking on their part to fully appreciate the contributions of development.

    • Crisis Response.  The initial delegation of responsibilities in response to crises is precarious.  The punted decision on where USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives will reside indicates that many of these decisions are still evolving.

    Re-published with permission by the Center for Global Development. Visit the original article.

    • Institutional Development
    • Trade & Policy
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).

    About the author

    • Devex Editor

      Devex Editor

      Thanks a lot for your interest in Devex News. To share news and views, story ideas and press releases, please email editor@devex.com. We look forward to hearing from you.

    Search for articles

    Related Jobs

    • Individual Consultant: Customs Facilities Expert
      Dhaka, Bangladesh | Teknaf, Bangladesh | Bangladesh | South Asia
    • Individual Consultant: Digital Trade Expert
      Phnom Penh, Cambodia | Cambodia | East Asia and Pacific | South Asia
    • Administration Intern
      United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP)
      Bangkok, Thailand | Thailand | East Asia and Pacific
    • See more

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 2
      FCDO's top development contractors in 2024/25
    • 3
      Strengthening health systems by measuring what really matters
    • 4
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 5
      How AI-powered citizen science can be a catalyst for the SDGs

    Trending

    Financing for Development Conference

    The Trump Effect

    Newsletters

    Related Stories

    The future of US aidReported State plan like ‘cutting your legs out from under you’

    Reported State plan like ‘cutting your legs out from under you’

    The future of US aidState Department releases new ‘America First’ reorganization plan

    State Department releases new ‘America First’ reorganization plan

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: Trump gets rid of over 95% of USAID staff

    Devex Newswire: Trump gets rid of over 95% of USAID staff

    Devex Pro InsiderDevex Pro Insider: USAID 0.25? And Hollywood steps into the foreign aid fray

    Devex Pro Insider: USAID 0.25? And Hollywood steps into the foreign aid fray

    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement