• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Opinion
    • News
    • Contributor: Allan Weatherall

    The recruitment dichotomy

    An Australian-based freelance consultant asked the 40,000+ members of the Devex Group on LinkedIn what the most important attributes are when hiring a consultant in the field of development. The results, he says in this guest opinion, are both surprising and revealing.

    By Allan Weatherall // 19 November 2013
    The Devex LinkedIn Group for international development professionals. The discussion centers on the prevailing views of the community about the important attributes to consider when hiring an international development consultant? Photo by: Devex

    What makes an expert consultant in international development? Perhaps this is a question that crosses the minds of consultants and recruiters from time to time. It’s certainly a question that’s been on my mind as I’ve sought to offer my services as a freelance consultant. What skills are most needed? What areas of personal and professional development do I need to prioritize? What should I emphasise most when I prepare a resume?

    I decided to explore the prevailing views of the international development community by posing a question to the 40,000+ members of the Devex Group on LinkedIn: “When hiring a consultant in the field of International Development, what are the most important attributes?”

    a) Practical knowledge and field experience?

    b) Academic qualifications in development?

    c) Cultural familiarity with the country?

    d) Professional experience in related field?

    e) Affinity with your organization’s values?

    The results

    The results I received from the survey were both surprising and revealing.

    “Practical knowledge and field experience” romped in as the clear winner well ahead of the field with a whopping 66 percent, followed by “professional experience” trailing significantly behind at 22 percent. Next in line was “cultural familiarity” at a mere 5 percent with “affinity for your organizational values” next at 3 percent.  And academic qualifications come in a very surprising last at only 2 percent.

    The apparent contradiction

    Anyone who has scoured the internet looking at job ads may already see something in these results that I quickly noticed: There appears to be an inverse relationship between the attributes that are most valued by international development professionals and those attributes that are most often requested in advertised positions.

    If you do a survey of most job ads, academic qualifications usually feature high on the list of specified minimum requirements. Organizations also often seek staff members who share their organization’s particular values — the second-least valued attribute in the survey.

    So on one hand, job ads are emphasizing academic qualifications and values-alignment, but seasoned professionals see these as the least important and useful traits of all.

    So why this dichotomy?

    I’ll try to suggest some possible explanations for this. Perhaps not all readers will agree with me so, by all means, please feel free to contribute your own thoughts.

    Possibility 1: Recruiters are simply too busy

    Recruiting agents have indicated that they frequently get so many applications for a position that they simply do not have adequate time to examine all of the details of an applicant’s resume. Some say that 30 to 60 seconds per resume is all that they allocate to initially decide whether an applicant is a possible candidate worthy of further consideration.

    However not all recruiters screen applicants based on academic credentials. One U.S.-based recruiter admitted to me that when screening candidates, academic credentials barely come into play at all.  She suggested that prior experience, proven capability, and other performance indicators were way higher on the list and advised job seekers to prioritize those on their resumes. In fact, she admitted that she often recommends an applicant to her clients even if they don’t meet the minimum academic requirements specified in the position description.

    Possibility 2: The education default

    Some recruiters looking for shortcuts in the selection process may also be looking for ways to mitigate their responsibility in the selection process. Choosing the most qualified candidate based on their academic achievements, regardless of whether or not they are the most suited to the role, may provide a plausible safeguard against backlash later. If a candidate fails to perform and someone asks the question, “Who made the decision to hire this person?” then there’s always the plausible defense: “Well, he/she certainly looked suitably qualified!”

    Possibility 3: Lack of knowledge of what the position really requires

    An Australian-based NGO advertised a senior management role for a facility processing asylum seekers in a Pacific Island location. During the interview process, an experienced candidate expressed the view that the highest priority should be the care and emotional wellbeing of detainees, but he left with the impression that the interviewers themselves didn’t have a clear grasp of the real challenges that mission was likely to face. A few months later, he learned that the detainees at that center rioted, with disastrous results to compound infrastructure.

    What lessons might we draw from this? It’s impossible to recruit staff for demanding missions abroad without practical knowledge and understanding of the real challenges that are likely to be faced on the ground. In that particular instance, the hiring organization appeared to be looking for someone with senior management skills who knew something about humanitarian aid. What they really needed was an expert in humanitarian aid who knew something about management.

    Possibility 4: The culture of academia in international development

    Of course all international development initiatives should be informed by adequate research. However, there seems to be a tendency within large organizations to theorize at length and to expend large portions of the budget on endless studies, talk-fests, lengthy meetings, international travel and seminars. And often what’s really most needed is a few phone calls, some consultation and some decisive action.

    Academics have a valuable contribution to make to international development, but the biggest myth about higher education is that it reliably certifies an individual’s intelligence and capabilities. The cross-cultural nature of development and the unique demands and challenges that are often encountered in the field require knowledge and skills that are often not acquirable through formal learning.

    Possibility 5: Unhealthy corporate culture and political pressure

    Assessing an applicant’s suitability for an international mission can be detailed process, and international ventures are often very expensive and sometimes high-risk initiatives. Consequently there are often political implications that come with success or failure — particularly when dealing with large organizations and government-funded initiatives. When multiple “stakeholders” are watching with a critical eye, it can be very easy for those in management to be influenced by the pressures of their expectations, especially if there is a chance of a political backlash.

    When staff selection processes become clouded by political considerations, it’s possible that more qualified candidates are passed over in favor of candidates who come with more impressive academic credentials or the right connections.

    Possibility 6: Sometimes the most academically qualified applicant is the right choice

    Of course it very much depends on the nature of the role and there are some assignments where academically qualified expertise is quite legitimately the highest priority, such as in structural engineering or medical professions. But even in these categories, experience in very demanding field environments can also be critical to mission success.

    Possibility 7: The survey results are flawed

    While that’s always a possibility, I very much doubt it. To test the results I also hosted the same survey in different forums and got very similar results.

    Please leave a comment below, tweet @devexcareers or join the Devex LinkedIn group for recruiters.

    • Careers & Education
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the author

    • Allan Weatherall

      Allan Weatherall

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    Artificial intelligenceAI in development recruitment: Time-saver or barrier to inclusion?

    AI in development recruitment: Time-saver or barrier to inclusion?

    #GlobaldevJobsCareer advice from a young consultant who landed a World Bank gig

    Career advice from a young consultant who landed a World Bank gig

    Career ExplorerWhat development pros need to know about fisheries and aquaculture

    What development pros need to know about fisheries and aquaculture

    Career Explorer Indigenous rights: 4 things all development workers should know

    Indigenous rights: 4 things all development workers should know

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: How climate philanthropy can solve its innovation challenge
    • 2
      The legal case threatening to upend philanthropy's DEI efforts
    • 3
      Closing the loop: Transforming waste into valuable resources
    • 4
      Why most of the UK's aid budget rise cannot be spent on frontline aid
    • 5
      How is China's foreign aid changing?
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement