• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Opinion
    • Erin Hohlfelder on aid transparency

    Will new Ebola pledges face same old accountability problem?

    If the existing mechanisms do not change to more consistently hold donors accountable for their pledges, there is a real risk that promises could continue to be unfulfilled without any real consequence, ONE Campaign's policy director for global health writes in this guest op-ed.

    By Erin Hohlfelder // 15 July 2015
    David Nabarro, special envoy of the United Nations secretary-general on Ebola, with Helen Clark, administrator of the U.N. Development Program at a press conference following the conclusion of the International Conference on Ebola Recovery. Photo by: Loey Felipe / U.N.

    They came. They saw. They pledged.

    With the cloud of new Ebola cases in Liberia hanging over last week’s U.N. Ebola Recovery Conference, governments and private sector partners showed up in New York determined to prove their commitment to ending the outbreak once and for all. For hours on Thursday, they listened as representatives from Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone presented their Mano River Union Plan for recovering from the crisis and restarting their collective economic development, imploring donors to support — rather than go around — the plans.

    Then on Friday, after hearing the details of these plans, donors delivered their statements of support for the countries — making sure to tout the contributions they had already made and lessons they had learned, and pledging significant new assistance to rebuild the three affected countries stronger than they were before Ebola.

    The donors’ pledges ranged in amount (from $1 million from Azerbaijan to $650 million from the World Bank) and in scope (from health worker training to nutrition supplementation to hygiene programs in schools). All told, the U.N. Development Program reported that donors had pledged $3.4 billion, bringing the total resources pledged for the recovery of the Ebola-affected countries to an astounding total of more than $5 billion.

    You would think with a headline figure like that, partners would have left the conference feeling ecstatic, or at least adequately armed for the rebuilding challenges ahead. And yet there was still so much confusion over the pledges made that it was hard to leave with a clear verdict on what had been accomplished. What money was really new and additional, versus old and repackaged? Where does the ongoing Ebola response end and the recovery effort begin — and can we even tell the difference on the ground anymore? What was our true baseline need for recovery, and what gaps did we fill?

    For those of us who have tried to track resource flows throughout the Ebola crisis, these questions have become a recurring nightmare. After more than six months spent building and updating our own Ebola resource tracker, we learned a clear lesson that we outlined in a new white paper last week: The tools we have today for tracking resources in a crisis are not fit-for-purpose. In many instances, it is possible to find information about one category of a donor’s pledge, but there is no “one-stop-shop” that donors, implementers and the public can use to reliably understand, measure and compare what amounts and types of resources have been pledged, what resources have been disbursed, and what gaps remain unfilled.

    While financial accountability may seem like a boring accounting exercise, we believe it’s actually a matter of life or death. If we don’t know what has been promised and what has been delivered, we can’t adequately match promised resources to needs on the ground. That means gaps cannot be easily identified, and time lags will result in more lives lost. Confusion over pledges makes it difficult to hold donors accountable, which may leave millions of promised funds unspent. Conversely, better understanding about what donors have disbursed will give advocates clearer grounds for full-throated praise of those who have stepped up and made impactful contributions — just like many of them did on Friday at the U.N.

    These challenges, unfortunately, are not new. Analysis of past crises, such as the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and the 2010 Haiti earthquake, reveals remarkably similar challenges in tracking how much money was pledged and where it ended up. In an age of unprecedented access to technology, it’s frustrating to see our development and humanitarian communities continue to make the same mistakes.

    In order for advocates to have data that will allow them to hold donors accountable for their promises, there must be a globally accepted, well-resourced tracking system that can collect and provide unambiguous information — ideally with the political teeth to ensure consistency and fairness across donors. At the same time, a system is only as good as donors’ willingness to supply it with good information. Therefore, donors must provide both commitment and disbursement amounts, while also agreeing to a clear, consistent definition of disbursement; report humanitarian assistance according to the standards set by the International Aid Transparency Initiative; and more generally, abide by ONE’s “TRACK principles,” making commitments that are: Transparent, Results-oriented, clear about which resources are Additional and which have any Conditions, and Kept.

    It is not too early to start building such a system, even though we may have missed the chance to fully account for resources in the current Ebola crisis. As we speak, thousands of donors, civil society partners, and technical experts are gathering in Addis Ababa for the third International Conference on Financing for Development. Among other hot topics discussed there, many (including ONE) will be pushing for strong commitments to donor transparency and for investments in mapping and filling data gaps — all as part of the wider “data revolution.”

    At least four high-level Ebola panels or initiatives are also underway, tasked with learning lessons from the crisis and making concrete recommendations for the future. These include the U.N. secretary-general’s high-level panel, the World Health Organization’s independent Ebola Interim Assessment Panel, the U.S. Institute of Medicine’s effort to create a Global Health Risk Framework, and an Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola. We are encouraged that at least the Institute of Medicine effort will look at financial accountability and hope that others will also take up this topic.

    Ultimately, if the existing mechanisms do not change to more consistently hold donors accountable for their pledges, there is a real risk that promises could continue to be unfulfilled without any real consequence. Until we can resolve this challenge, we are doomed to repeat our collective mistakes, and lose time, resources and lives in the next crisis.

    Join the Devex community and access more in-depth analysis, breaking news and business advice — and a host of other services — on international development, humanitarian aid and global health.

    Read more stories on transparency:

    ► Ebola and information: Why donors must publish what they fund

    ► How better standards and better data can help deliver sustainable #Fin4Dev outcomes

    ► Nepal vows transparency, efficiency as donors pledge billions in aid

    ► Remedy for a trillion dollar problem?

    ► How open data can increase transparency in the aid sector

    • West Africa
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the author

    • Erin Hohlfelder

      Erin Hohlfelder

      Erin Hohlfelder is policy director for global health at the ONE Campaign, where she leads health policy analysis and manages relationships with technical partners across global markets, focusing on infectious diseases, maternal and child health, and financing mechanisms. Before joining ONE, Hohlfelder worked for the Global Network for Neglected Tropical Diseases at the Sabin Vaccine Institute.

    Search for articles

    Related Jobs

    • New Business Consultant
      Banyan Global
      Washington, DC, District of Columbia, United States
    • Team Leader
      The Asia Foundation
      Bangkok, Thailand
    • Global Public Health Consultants
      Global Health Technical Assistance and Mission Support Project
      Worldwide
    • See more

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 2
      FCDO's top development contractors in 2024/25
    • 3
      Strengthening health systems by measuring what really matters
    • 4
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 5
      How AI-powered citizen science can be a catalyst for the SDGs

    Trending

    Financing for Development Conference

    The Trump Effect

    Newsletters

    Related Stories

    Sponsored by Gates FoundationOpinion: Enlightened self-interest demands global health investments

    Opinion: Enlightened self-interest demands global health investments

    Global DevelopmentIn 2025, global development’s new era begins

    In 2025, global development’s new era begins

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: Global finance summit tests leadership in Seville

    Devex Newswire: Global finance summit tests leadership in Seville

    Development FinanceWhat happened at the last FfD conference, and what has changed since?

    What happened at the last FfD conference, and what has changed since?

    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement