Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation



  • Organization TypeFoundation
  • Staff6-25
  • HeadquartersUnited States
  • Founded2000
It is critical that the Foundation is clear on how it believes it can make a difference in the programmatic areas where it invests. There are several huge problems facing the world today and they are sure that more will arise in the future. Many of these are of a scope and complexity too large for this Foundation to take head on. In these areas, the Foundation may not be able to make significant impact and Betty and I don’t want the Foundation to just support good intentions. For example, global climate change and the crisis in primary education might be two of the most important challenges of the time, and that makes it tempting to address them.However, unless the Foundation can satisfy itself that it has the capacity and resources to be a significant factor in bringing about measurable, durable solutions to an important subset of these kinds of intractable problems, the Foundation should forego investment. The Foundation should take advantage of its ability to focus its efforts and flexibility to move resources from less-productive areas to areas of higher impact. Such changes should be carefully considered and deliberate so as not to jerk the grantees around, to preserve progress the Foundation has accomplished, and to prevent unplanned mission drift. The Foundation must not take on too many programs at once causing it to operate at an insufficient scale to make an important difference.  How they intend the foundation to operate This is a grantmaking foundation, not an operating foundation. The Foundation should have an independent perspective and proactively choose its programs, strategies and goals, and then select the best grantees to do the work, rather than respond to unsolicited proposals. The Foundation selects and coordinates with individuals and organizations that have good ideas and the ability to execute, and funds them to accomplish the job. The Foundation is critically dependent on capable grantees and should work with them as respected experts in their fields. Emphasis should be on supporting programs with measurable outcomes rather than undirected institutional support. To gain valuable perspective and adapt and learn, there should be regular reviews of the Foundation’s work by outside experts. These assessments must be independent, credible and impartial, and shared without filtering with the program staff, Foundation management and the Board. There are many important things that can be done to make the world a better place where the Foundation can show leadership. These should be the areas where the Foundation focuses. Betty and I do not want the Foundation to aspire to be one of the pack pursuing the latest fad, but rather to find and address important under-resourced opportunities. What Areas of Interest They Chose They chose the original areas of interest (environmental conservation, scientific research, higher education and the San Francisco Bay Area) because of the special involvement in these areas prior to the formation of the Foundation, as well as the great opportunities they represent.  They interest in environmental conservation stems from the personal observations of changes in the natural world and from the dependency of all living species on the planet’s health. During the lifetimes they have observed the transformation of much of what was natural wilderness to highly-developed property.  Jungles have become golf courses; beaches, condominium developments; and the oceans have been overfished and become garbage dumps. With these changes, precious ecosystem functions are lost, often forever. Huge areas of the planet are in danger of having their basic structure altered as a consequence of development and exploitation of resources. The Foundation should seek pragmatic solutions that maintain the integrity of essential ecosystem functions while accommodating necessary development and other activity.   The support of science stems from Gordon’s background and interests. Expanding knowledge is both intellectually satisfying and often of practical value. The rate of expansion of knowledge can be increased by funding potentially high-impact areas that do not fit conventional funding sources. The Foundation’s science funding also helps research universities to excel and train the next generation of scientists.  Many opportunities exist, both in areas of immediate potential practical application and in pure expansion of knowledge. Both areas can be accelerated by carefully targeted private funding.  Here many good opportunities develop as conventional science funding agencies shrink and become increasingly risk-averse. After the Foundation started it soon became apparent that higher education was closely connected with the science interests. It was determined that it did not make sense to have higher education as a separate funding area. With respect to the Bay Area, they spent most of the lives here and want to help preserve the area’s special character. Even with a local geographic focus they still envision the same results-oriented strategic principles be applied in a regional context. Again, opportunities abound and the Foundation must be selective. Betty’s interest in health care and her poor hospital experiences led the Foundation to undertake an effort to improve nursing with the goal of better patient outcomes. This successful initiative led to venturing further into patient care. So long as the Foundation can identify opportunities for meaningful improvement, it should consider continuing and evolving the patient care program. However the magnitude of health care is so large and complex, the Foundation must be careful to limit its involvement to where it can make a unique contribution. While Betty and I anticipate that these original areas of interest will likely continue to present important opportunities for the Foundation to make a difference and show leadership for many generations to come, they also recognize that the future can change the landscape of problems and opportunities considerably. Since there is little chance that all the important issues will ever be addressed, the Foundation has been established to function in perpetuity, or as long as its resources remain sufficient to make a significant difference. In recognition of the fact that needs and opportunities will change over time, they wish to give the Trustees sufficient latitude to keep the Foundation relevant but hope that this will not result in premature abandonment of successful programs. Driven by the vision of the founders, they enable lasting, meaningful change through sustained, scientifically sound philanthropy. They appreciate the role as society’s venture capital, making bold investments and taking considered risks, to attain significant results that can improve the future. They seek to achieve through philanthropy what Gordon Moore accomplished for the world of computing: to create an ever more powerful engine of progress in society.  

Where is Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
    Location of open jobs


    Job openings over the past year

    2Total posted jobs

    Examples of past jobs

    • Program Associate
      United States
    • Marine Microbiology Initiative Intern
      United States

    Contact Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

    Former staff

    {{contact.full_name}} - {{contact.headline || contact.employment_title}}
    • Updated {{contact.updated_at | date:dateFormat}}
    Company Offices
    • United States (headquarters)
    • Palo Alto
    • 1661 Page Mill Road


    Primary sectors

    Grant Management
    Financial Services
    Climate Change
    Economic Policy
    Project Support
    Research & Development
    Trade Policy / Tariffs
    Public Financial Management