• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Opinion
    • The Future of DfID

    As long as there's extreme poverty, there's a need for DfID

    DfID’s work doesn’t just have a global scope, it cuts across all U.K departments and development sectors as well. And unless extreme poverty is eradicated, there will continue to be a need for the U.K. aid agency, Baroness Northover, parliamentary undersecretary of state for international development, argues for the #FutureofDfID.

    By Baroness Northover // 02 April 2015
    Baroness Northover, parliamentary undersecretary of state for international development, during a panel discussion at the 59th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. Photo by: Susan Markisz / UN Women / CC BY-NC-ND

    Does the U.K. Department for International Development have a future? The simple answer is “yes” — and it should.

    Far down the track, long into the future, the answer may be “no” — but that is indeed far distant.

    The Liberal Democrats have helped to ensure DfID’s future. My colleagues, Michael Moore in the House of Commons and Jeremy Purvis in the House of Lords, steered through a Private Member’s Bill to enshrine in law the U.K.’s commitment to contribute 0.7 percent of gross national income to development assistance. Royal assent was granted on the day that Parliament prorogued for the general election.

    In 2000, the Millennium Development Goals aimed to halve extreme poverty by 2015. The world quite remarkably achieved that. The replacement sustainable development goals, due for agreement at the United Nations in September, aim to eradicate extreme poverty by 2030, while seeking to leave no one behind.

    This will be even more challenging than the original goal.

    It is in failed states, in particular those in conflict, and among disadvantaged groups, such as the elderly, those with disabilities, and those from minority groups, that extreme poverty and the inability to have significant control over their lives — even to keep themselves alive at all — are manifest. And globally, with no country excepted, women and girls have fewer rights, are poorer, and find themselves most excluded.

    Coming down the track are overarching major challenges, the key being climate change.  The poorest will be most vulnerable.

    Few should therefore doubt the scale of the task for any international development department. Huge public support for Comic Relief shows that the U.K. public generally understands that. To sustain such support will depend a great deal on cross-party, nongovernmental organization, civil society and other support, to argue the case — again and again and again.

    As in every department, ministers must ensure that DfID continues to spell out what it does, why, how, with what results, and how this is evaluated, both internally and through rigorous external independent examination. It must ensure that it leverages others.

    The focus on governance, increasing tax collection, ensuring sustainability and encouraging growth will all be key. Working with other players — whether the United Nations, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization, actors such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, blocs such as the European Union, G-8, G-77, African Union and the BRICs  — will be vital.

    But while aid remains crucial for some countries, especially fragile states, or in circumstances including humanitarian crises or post-conflict, there is likely to be a shift toward so-called global public goods that affect us all — tackling global pollution, cross-border epidemics and the arms trade, and more.

    We also need to address other areas with huge effect on developing countries — trade policies, taxation, agricultural subsidies, intellectual property rights — and DfID’s central voice in government is essential here.

    Enshrining 0.7 percent in law matters. Most departmental budgets are relatively stable, but that has never been the case for development. In 1996, for example, the Conservatives committed only 0.26 percent of GNI to aid. The level had even sunk to 0.24 percent under Labour in 1999, which rose to 0.51 percent in 2006 after the hugely successful Make Poverty History year, but sank again to 0.36 percent the following year.

    How can sustained long-term commitments to education or health systems be based on such unpredictability?

    Under the Coalition, we reached 0.7 percent in 2013. There is pressure to reduce this. Michael Moore’s law is therefore a game changer.

    So might other departments look with interest at DfID’s budget?  

    If that means working together on development, that is surely fine. We must work across departments, including the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, the Ministry of Defense, the Department for Education, the Department for Health, the Ministry of Justice, the Government Equalities Office, and so on.

    Climate change, diplomacy, trade and economic growth, military assistance (as in Sierra Leone on Ebola), education, health, international law, and equalities all interlink with DfID’s work.

    But it is immensely helpful that we report to the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development on official development assistance. This means that — whatever the temptations — ODA must be for development. Any leeching of funds for non-ODA projects would mean replenishing DfID, not something likely to enthuse any treasury. This is useful protection.

    My experience of DfID as a minister is that this is a superb, thoughtful and strategic department, attracting high caliber people. Its close associations with research, think tanks and academia are vital — and of mutual benefit. Sometimes this will be overarching research, for example on the roots of conflict, on how skills and jobs may help to stem radicalism, what may foster or thwart growth; sometimes more specific areas. The research supported, for example into bovine tuberculosis in Ethiopia, can thus benefit the U.K. in turn. That is as it should be — we are, after all, in a globally connected world: Ebola in West Africa or antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia can quickly affect the U.K.; climate change affecting the Sahara, displacing people, causing conflict and migration, can impact us here in prosperous Europe.

    It is clearly through economic development that people are pulled from poverty. But human development, through education and health, is needed to support that. Not simply counting children into primary schools, but ensuring that they emerge with learning and skills.

    Underpinning development are rights — human rights — the most neglected of which are those of girls and women. Hence the practice of female genital mutilation or early and forced marriage; or the universal acceptance that women must assume disproportionate caring responsibilities, together with economic tasks, but with no commensurate recompense —  owning so little of the world’s wealth and property, yet contributing so much of its work; and with limited ability to control fertility — husbands free to tear from their wives’ arms their contraceptive implants. Women are indeed so often the second sex.

    We know that helping to relieve poverty is morally right. We also know that development is in our strategic interests, to help secure a more peaceful world. As Liberal Democrats we have ensured that there will be the budget to do this.

    Until we have at least managed to eradicate extreme poverty, there will continue to be a need for a Department for International Development.

    Stay tuned for more U.K. election coverage and news, views and analysis on how this impacts DfID and U.K. aid in the coming weeks. To explore additional content, visit the Future of DfID series site, follow us on Twitter and tweet using the hashtag #FutureofDfID.

    Read more on the #FutureofDfID:

    ● UK #GE2015: The moment of truth for DfID?
    ● DfID to increase trade role in future — Greening
    ● Labour MP: DfID has 'lost its way' under Cameron
    ● DfID is changing — but is it changing fast enough?
    ● Debate on the future of aid ‘makes me worry’
    ● Time to recognize private sector role in UK aid
    ● DfID's importance 'shouldn’t be understated'

    • Social/Inclusive Development
    • Democracy, Human Rights & Governance
    • Trade & Policy
    • United Kingdom
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the author

    • Baroness Northover

      Baroness Northover

      Lindsay Northover is Parliamentary undersecretary of state at the Department for International Development. Prior to 2010, she was Liberal Democrat spokeswoman on international development in the House of Lords. She is a former trustee of UNICEF, the Tropical Health and Education Trust, a former council member of the Overseas Development Institute and chaired Women Liberal Democrats. Her first degree was from Oxford; her doctorate from the U.S., and she was a lecturer at University College, London.

    Search for articles

    Related Jobs

    • Advocacy and Campaigns Admin Assistant (Fixed-Term, Hybrid)
      London, United Kingdom | United Kingdom | Western Europe
    • Nigeria based Climate Change Technical Specialist
      Alinea International Ltd.
      Nigeria | West Africa
    • Consultancy Services to Conduct the Assessment and Development an Implementation Plan to Increase the Participation of Women in Logistics
      Lusaka, Zambia | Zambia | Southern Africa
    • See more

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 2
      FCDO's top development contractors in 2024/25
    • 3
      Strengthening health systems by measuring what really matters
    • 4
      How AI-powered citizen science can be a catalyst for the SDGs
    • 5
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB

    Trending

    Financing for Development Conference

    The Trump Effect

    Newsletters

    Related Stories

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: A messy data dump clouds US funding picture

    Devex Newswire: A messy data dump clouds US funding picture

    Devex Money MattersMoney Matters: What do we know about US State Department aid funding?

    Money Matters: What do we know about US State Department aid funding?

    Devex Pro LiveUK aid cuts: 6 things left to fight for

    UK aid cuts: 6 things left to fight for

    Democracy and governanceGodfather of soft power leaves legacy of diplomacy at time of volatility

    Godfather of soft power leaves legacy of diplomacy at time of volatility

    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement