Details of US Budget Cuts to Foreign Affairs Programs Emerge

U.S. President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden meet with Office of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew and Rob Nabors, White House director of legislative affairs, on April 5, 2011, at the Oval Office, April 5, 2011. Obama and Biden later held talks with House Republican and Senate Democratic leaders on the federal government's budget. Photo by: Pete Souza / The White House

The U.S. budget deal struck by Congress last Friday (April 8) contains more than $8.4 billion in cuts to the Obama administration’s foreign affairs spending request for fiscal 2011 and is a $504 million reduction from fiscal 2010 levels.

The House and Senate are expected to take up the 2011 spending bill on Thursday (April 14).

According to details published on the House Appropriations Committee’s website, the cuts apply to the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Millennium Challenge Corp., in addition to the U.S. government’s financing of multilateral institutions:

“These significant cuts to the State Department and foreign assistance will mean we will not meet some of the ambitious goals set for the nation in the President’s Budget,” wrote White House Communications Director Dan Pfieffer on the White House blog.

Reflecting the tense nature of negotiations throughout the fiscal 2011 budget battles, the Senate Appropriations Committee attempted to strike a positive tone with the final budget deal relative to the most extreme cuts proposed in House Resolution 1, while the House Appropriations Committee emphasized the strength of the cuts achieved.

In a press release, the Senate Appropriations Committee noted that “H.R. 1 would have cut funding for the Department of State and foreign operations by $3.8 billion below the FY10 enacted level…It would have caused serious harm to U.S. embassy and consular operations which millions of Americans who live, work and study abroad depend on every day, and to programs that directly protect U.S. national security and other important diplomatic and economic interests, and which provide life-saving aid to victims of disease, war and natural disasters.”

Meanwhile on the House side, committee chairman Hal Rogers noted in a release that “Never before has any Congress made dramatic cuts such as those that are in this final legislation. The near $40 billion reduction in non-defense spending is nearly five times larger than any other cut in history, and is the result of this new Republican majority’s commitment to bring about real change in the way Washington spends the people’s money.”

To be sure, some programs were spared cuts proposed under H.R. 1:

Some elements of the U.S. foreign affairs budget were left intact.

>> Obama Pushes More Hires at USAID, State Department

>> White House Eyes New $200M Global Health Fund

Eliza Villarino contributed reporting to this article.

Read more about U.S. development aid.