• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Funding
    • Devex Analytics explains

    Fact check: Has aid really gone down with the pandemic?

    Devex’s head of analytics, Raquel Alcega, takes a look at the fine print behind the data cited in a recent Associated Press article.

    By Raquel Alcega // 27 July 2020
    Photo by: Skitterphoto on Pexels

    Devex’s head of analytics, Raquel Alcega, takes a look at the fine print behind the data cited in a recent Associated Press article.

    Last week, an exclusive by Associated Press claimed that aid from top donors is dropping, “even as need soars.”

    Citing an analysis from Development Initiatives, a respected U.K.-based consultancy, the story claimed that “Funding commitments, for the virus and otherwise, have dropped by a third from the same period last year.” But is that true?

    The analysis of how aid budgets are changing due to the pandemic is based solely on data from the International Aid Transparency Initiative. As DI admits, IATI data is limited. It is not compulsory for donors to report to IATI, despite the advocacy efforts toward this. It is also not mandatory for donors to mark their commitments as coronavirus-related within IATI, and there is no standard definition of what constitutes a coronavirus-related investment.

    DI’s argument is that IATI is the data source that allows the closest tracking of real-time changes in both humanitarian and development aid. But while IATI data has improved a lot — with more than 700 organizations now reporting their commitments and spending in this common open data standard — it is widely recognized that the quality and scope of the data requires continuous improvement.

    And, even assuming the data is accurate, AP’s interpretation is misleading.

    The analysis focuses on comparing what happened in the first five months of 2020 with what would have happened if COVID-19 hadn’t happened, based on aid commitments registered with IATI from key donors since 2015.

    Also, the statement from AP regarding the drop of a third in aid funding during the first five months of the year corresponds only to the largest bilateral agencies considered in the analysis.

    According to DI’s analysis, aid commitments during this time period were $16.9 billion, compared to $23.9 billion during the same time period in 2019, which means that real 2020 aid commitments are roughly a third less. For DI, this suggests bilateral actors might have been paying “the economic price of Covid-19.”

    On the other hand, the analysis shows that multilateral organizations — including development banks, United Nations agencies, and the Global Fund — have published more aid commitments in this time period than expected.

    As a result, DI concludes that the overall trend in aid commitments — based on IATI’s data — “shows an overall increase in spending over the early months of 2020,” potentially because of the response to the coronavirus crisis. This is not what the AP article communicates. Taking just a few lines of data analysis is not a reliable way to explain the story. Data has its nuances, its context, and rarely tells the whole story by itself.

    Looking at bilateral commitments alone, DI calls for more detailed, timely data to be able to conduct a more reliable analysis.

    This first analysis is a useful exercise for taking the available data into account. But understanding that the data source is not comprehensive and that for government agencies, that period of time is considered as one of the most stressful, it’s worth taking these numbers with a pinch of salt.

    For access to in-depth analysis, insights, and funding opportunities from over 850+ sources — combined with Devex Pro news content — sign up to a Pro Funding subscription online today or get in touch to learn about our Pro Funding group options.

    • Funding
    • Research
    • Humanitarian Aid
    • AP
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).

    About the author

    • Raquel Alcega

      Raquel Alcega

      Raquel Alcega leads the data research and analysis at Devex, providing advice to organizations on the latest funding and programmatic trends that shape the global development space. She also heads up the news business content strategy and designs internal knowledge management processes. Prior to joining Devex’s Barcelona office, she worked in business development in Washington, D.C., and as a researcher in Russia and Mexico.

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    Funding InsightsWho’s funding the World Health Organization?

    Who’s funding the World Health Organization?

    Devex Money MattersMoney Matters: What did Gates spend $5.4 billion on last year?

    Money Matters: What did Gates spend $5.4 billion on last year?

    Devex Money MattersMoney Matters: What’s MCC going to fund this year?

    Money Matters: What’s MCC going to fund this year?

    Devex Money MattersMoney Matters: Trump’s latest plan to slash foreign aid

    Money Matters: Trump’s latest plan to slash foreign aid

    Most Read

    • 1
      How low-emissions livestock are transforming dairy farming in Africa
    • 2
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 3
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 4
      The UN's changing of the guard
    • 5
      USAID's humanitarian bureau is under pressure and overstretched
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement