• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • News
    • USAID

    House oversight committee members zero in on USAID implemention, procurement reforms

    The U.S. Agency for International Development appears to be in for a tough time defending its pursuit of country-led development: Three Republican congressmen are demanding assurances that channeling more aid through country systems will not compromise accountability, transparency and effectiveness.

    By Ivy Mungcal // 26 April 2012
    The U.S. Agency for International Development appears to be in for a tough time defending its pursuit of country-led development: Three Republican congressmen are demanding assurances that channeling more aid through country systems will not compromise accountability, transparency and effectiveness. In a letter to USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah, the chair and two members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform expressed concern that “funneling grants directly to unaccountable and often corrupt foreign governments without necessary safeguards will reduce program effectiveness, accountability, and transparency and waste taxpayer dollars.” Republican Reps. Darrell Issa of California, Jason Chafettz of Utah and James Lankord of Oklahoma have given USAID until May 8 to explain in detail its plans to channel more aid directly to recipient governments and non-U.S. organizations. Questions raised by three congressmen include: • How can USAID ensure foreign governments and nongovernmental organizations that will receive direct U.S. funding will be subject to the same standards of accountability and transparency imposed on USAID contractors? • How will USAID maintain oversight of local firms and NGOs? • How can USAID guarantee channeling 30 percent of aid through country systems will be as effective and responsive as the current contracting process? USAID’s push for country ownership and use of local country systems is a key part of the agency’s reform agenda USAID Forward. The agency aims to increase direct funding for local governments, NGOs and businesses from the current 13 percent of its total budget to 30 percent by 2015. The United States is not the only donor implementing aid reforms to support country-led development. The United Kingdom, Australia and the European Union, among others, have also been increasing the amount of money funneled through country systems in an effort to increase recipient countries’ “ownership” of their development. Read more on U.S. aid reform online, and subscribe to The Development Newswire to receive top international development headlines from the world’s leading donors, news sources and opinion leaders — emailed to you FREE every business day.

    The U.S. Agency for International Development appears to be in for a tough time defending its pursuit of country-led development: Three Republican congressmen are demanding assurances that channeling more aid through country systems will not compromise accountability, transparency and effectiveness.

    In a letter to USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah, the chair and two members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform expressed concern that “funneling grants directly to unaccountable and often corrupt foreign governments without necessary safeguards will reduce program effectiveness, accountability, and transparency and waste taxpayer dollars.”

    Republican Reps. Darrell Issa of California, Jason Chafettz of Utah and James Lankord of Oklahoma have given USAID until May 8 to explain in detail its plans to channel more aid directly to recipient governments and non-U.S. organizations.

    This story is forDevex Promembers

    Unlock this story now with a 15-day free trial of Devex Pro.

    With a Devex Pro subscription you'll get access to deeper analysis and exclusive insights from our reporters and analysts.

    Start my free trialRequest a group subscription
    Already a user? Sign in
    • Funding
    • Trade & Policy
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    Should your team be reading this?
    Contact us about a group subscription to Pro.

    About the author

    • Ivy Mungcal

      Ivy Mungcal

      As former senior staff writer, Ivy Mungcal contributed to several Devex publications. Her focus is on breaking news, and in particular on global aid reform and trends in the United States, Europe, the Caribbean, and the Americas. Before joining Devex in 2009, Ivy produced specialized content for U.S. and U.K.-based business websites.

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    The future of US aidDeath, reform, and power: Rubio spars with Senate over USAID cuts

    Death, reform, and power: Rubio spars with Senate over USAID cuts

    The Trump EffectWhat African experts say must change about US foreign aid

    What African experts say must change about US foreign aid

    The future of us aidOpinion: USAID can maintain its impact amid a transition to DOS

    Opinion: USAID can maintain its impact amid a transition to DOS

    NGOsOpinion: Let USAID’s legacy live on through thoughtful NGO programming

    Opinion: Let USAID’s legacy live on through thoughtful NGO programming

    Most Read

    • 1
      How low-emissions livestock are transforming dairy farming in Africa
    • 2
      The UN's changing of the guard
    • 3
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 4
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 5
      Lasting nutrition and food security needs new funding — and new systems
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement