• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Opinion
    • Migration and displacement

    Opinion: Granting refugees the right to work can help revitalize economies

    In low and middle-income countries, granting refugees the ability to work is good policy — and economics, write Cindy Huang and Gideon Maltz.

    By Gideon Maltz, Cindy Huang // 08 November 2018
    A Jordanian man and a Syrian man working together in a plastics packaging factory in Amman, Jordan. Photo by: DFID / CC BY

    The discussion of refugees focuses too often on high-income countries in North America and Europe. In fact, it falls to a handful of middle- and low-income countries, such as Lebanon, Kenya, and Bangladesh, to host the majority of refugees around the world — and indeed to host refugees from intractable crises, such as Syria, Somalia, and Myanmar, that are likely to prevent refugees from returning for years or decades.

    These countries bear a tremendous responsibility — and deserve more credit than they get from the international community — but too often they limit their own potential by preventing the refugee populations they host from working or owning a business.

    More than just a roof: Why integration is key to refugee rehousing

    When it comes to housing refugees, is a roof enough? Devex takes a look at five steps to achieving integration via housing projects.

    In most of these countries — where 85 percent of the world’s 25 million refugees live — there is one policy in particular that is vital but rarely utilized: those preventing refugees from working legally or starting a business. Even in places where refugees technically have the right to work, fees, permits, and other restrictions can significantly restrict conditions.

    Research shows that when refugees can work formally, they have more productive work, and can make more money — which in turn means that refugees spend more money on local goods and services and generate more tax revenue. When refugees start their own businesses, they create more jobs for hosts. In Turkey, Syrian refugees have started more than 6,000 companies and created more than 55,000 jobs since 2011, to the benefit of citizens and the economy.

    Refugees can also fill labor shortages and bring new skills where needed. And by stimulating the local economy and filling low-skill, low-paying jobs, refugees can open new opportunities for hosts, enabling them to work more and upgrade into better jobs. For example, during the recent influx of refugees to Jordan, refugees began filling lower-skilled informal sector jobs. As a result, Jordanians began upgrading to formal sector jobs that paid more.

    In most of the countries that do not give refugees the legal right to work, refugees work illegally alongside the host community. Granting refugees the right to work should be especially beneficial in these contexts. First, it enables highly educated refugees to put their much-needed skills to better use. A Syrian doctor, for example, would not be able to apply her abilities in the informal sector — but she could in the formal market. Second, an increase in formal work should increase tax revenues without an increase in government spending.

    Finally, while some politicians have attempted to shield citizen jobs by isolating refugees, that actually can make the consequences for citizen jobs worse. Some degree of job displacement from refugee inflows is real, but research shows that it tends to be larger in magnitude when refugees are concentrated in certain areas or sectors of the economy. Thus, giving refugees access to the formal labor market — rather than crowding them into a few types of jobs in the informal sector within a limited area — can significantly reduce the effects that policymakers seek to avoid by restricting refugees’ right to work.

    Inevitably, there are some costs associated with granting refugees the right to work in the short term. These costs tend to disappear over time and are generally outweighed by economic and fiscal benefits — but they should nonetheless be taken seriously. With the support of the international community, policies can be implemented to mitigate costs and amplify benefits. For example, vocational training, job matching services, or short-term safety nets for the most vulnerable can help ease the transition.

    For developing countries that are already hosting refugees, allowing refugees to work is the first step in increasing economic benefits. That means also allowing freedom of movement so that refugees can go where workers are needed, lowering administrative barriers to getting a work permit or starting a business, and helping hosts adjust to ensure the benefits of enabling refugees to work leave no one behind. These are all policy choices. With short-sighted policy choices, politicians risk wasting the potential contributions of thousands of refugees already living in their borders — with smart policy choices, they can reap the economic benefits for host communities and refugees alike.

    • Careers & Education
    • Economic Development
    • Trade & Policy
    • Democracy, Human Rights & Governance
    • Social/Inclusive Development
    • Worldwide
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the authors

    • Gideon Maltz

      Gideon Maltz

      Gideon Maltz is the executive director of the Tent Partnership for Refugees. He previously served as deputy chief of staff to Ambassador Samantha Power at the U.S. mission to the United Nations; director of human rights and multilateral affairs at the U.S. National Security Council; and senior advisor to the administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Prior to government service, Gideon worked as an attorney in the international trade practice of Hogan Lovells and as a consultant at McKinsey & Company. He has also served as a Junior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a Predoctoral Fellow at Stanford’s Center for Democracy, Development, and Rule of Law. Gideon has a BA from Yale and a JD from Stanford Law School.
    • Cindy Huang

      Cindy Huang

      Cindy Huang is a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development, where she works on issues related to refugees, U.S. development policy and fragile and conflict-affected states. Previously, Cindy served in the Obama administration as the director of policy of the State Department’s Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations and was deputy vice president at the Millennium Challenge Corporation. Cindy is also the author of a recent report, "Refugee Compacts: Addressing the Crisis of Protracted Displacement."

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    Inclusive developmentOpinion: The economic case for women’s labor mobility is staggering

    Opinion: The economic case for women’s labor mobility is staggering

    Sponsored by the Women Entrepreneurs Finance Initiative (We-Fi)How breaking down financial barriers can unlock female entrepreneurship

    How breaking down financial barriers can unlock female entrepreneurship

    Climate financeOpinion: On climate, multilateral institutions must work with national banks

    Opinion: On climate, multilateral institutions must work with national banks

    Sponsored by GE HealthCareOpinion: AI-powered technologies can transform access to health care

    Opinion: AI-powered technologies can transform access to health care

    Most Read

    • 1
      The power of diagnostics to improve mental health
    • 2
      Lasting nutrition and food security needs new funding — and new systems
    • 3
      Opinion: Urgent action is needed to close the mobile gender gap
    • 4
      The UN's changing of the guard
    • 5
      The top local employers in Europe
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement