When organizations fail to acknowledge the differing experiences of men and women, they treat men as the default and women as the exception — an approach that often extends to their data collection.
For example, collecting data at the household level often means that men answer on behalf of women, because men are typically regarded as the head of the household. The results are “male unless otherwise indicated,” as coined in the landmark book “Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men.”
This approach undermines global development outcomes and hurts women, said Mara Bolis, a gender justice advocate, and advisor at Value for Women. Without gender-disaggregated data, which distinguishes between men and women, women and girls are effectively invisible. Governments, donors, and NGOs need to collect information on women in order to understand and meet their needs, Bolis said.