Localization has been part of the mainstream aid reform agenda ever since the 2016 Grand Bargain put the issue firmly on the map.
Proponents of localization such as the U.S. Agency for International Development outline two main strands. First, local entities should have more influence over what aid is spent on and how it is delivered. Second, development programs should be delivered by local governments and local organizations, which should therefore receive a larger share of the funding.
While some advocates believe these changes are simply the right thing to do, others argue that there are also practical benefits. Localization is often cited as making aid more efficient and cost-effective. It is said to lead to more cash remaining in local economies. Some even say it could help to address the sector’s safeguarding challenges.