• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • News
    • News

    Humanitarianism and the Question of Security

    By David Lepeska // 01 April 2009

    The need for better humanitarian security is clear. Total attacks on aid workers have skyrocketed in recent years, while major incidents per field worker doubled.

    Thus, the Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies at City University of New York's Graduate Center hosted a conference on the Frontiers of Humanitarianism this week, where debate centered on how to protect staffers and the people they serve.

    The International Rescue Committee, which has been working in conflict zones for 75 years, is constantly debating its security measures.

    "Protection has always been an element of what we do," said Sarah Smith, director of child protection and development at IRC. "The question is not about whether we protect, but how we protect."

    Protecting aid workers can mean working towards acceptance from the community, going low profile with unmarked cars, or deterrence, which includes armed guards and armored SUVs.

    But that's just part of the equation. Civilian deaths in the three most dangerous regions – Afghanistan, Somalia, and Darfur – have also increased markedly, which points up the connection between aid workers and civilians: If you can't protect the former, you can't protect the latter.

    "This distinction between staff and beneficiaries is perhaps a false one," said Smith, explaining that most of the staff are community members that live there, know the people and share their language and culture. To protect civilians, humanitarian actors can promote self-protection, advocate to their governments, foster a secure aid environment and even work toward direct protection – as in bringing refugees to camps or delivering children to orphanages.

    Yet because humanitarians often lack consent and protective capacity, Nicolas de Torrente, senior research fellow at Medecins Sans Frontiers USA and a former field worker, called it an "impossible mandate" for aid groups.

    "When measures are taken it's often problematic," he said. "They might not be effective and could compromise the aid work."

    Torrente cited how sometimes the mere presence of humanitarian actors deters attacks on civilians, but at the same time it's a potential danger – as in Zaire, where Torrente saw armed groups use humanitarians to lure civilians out of jungle hideouts. Additionally, speaking out in defense of people in danger often upsets one group or the other. It also represents a deviation from humanitarian principles.

    Torrente said the best practice is to provide assistance to victims in such a way that does not endanger them, to ask tough questions and make sure promises are kept.

    But the increasing standardization and professionalization of humanitarian security has actually narrowed the range of options, according to Larissa Fast, assistant professor at the Kroc Institute for International Peace at the University of Notre Dame. As aid agencies compete for donor dollars and play follow the leader, the practical security options are reduced. Further, the "bunkerization" of humanitarian work – using armed guards, razor wire and armored SUVs – has created a cycle of fear and a separation between aid workers and civilians.

    Such difficulties underscore a philosophical hurdle.

    "Humanitarian security strategies are usually reactive, assuming a problem can be fixed," Fast said. "But active acceptance is the only thing that can deflect these attacks."

    That appeared to be the consensus among the panelists, who saw clarifying one's mission and humanitarian principles and building trust among locals as the best among a handful of mediocre options. This raises one last problem.

    "Trust doesn't happen overnight," said Peter Walker, director of the Feinstein International Center at Tufts University. "So how do we deal with this dilemma in the short term?"

    • Humanitarian Aid
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).

    About the author

    • David Lepeska

      David Lepeska

      David has served as U.N. correspondent for the newswire UPI and reported for several major newspapers, including the New York Daily News and Newsday. He was chief correspondent for the Kashmir Observer in Srinagar, India, and regularly contributes to the Economist, among other publications. Since 2007, David has reported for Devex News from Washington, New York, as well as South Asia.

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    HumanitarianWhat lay behind the deaths of 7 World Central Kitchen staff in Gaza

    What lay behind the deaths of 7 World Central Kitchen staff in Gaza

    HumanitarianOpinion: Why we don’t mix humanitarian aid with military operations

    Opinion: Why we don’t mix humanitarian aid with military operations

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: Trump wants US Congress' seal of approval for aid cuts

    Devex Newswire: Trump wants US Congress' seal of approval for aid cuts

    HumanitarianOpinion: As seen in Gaza, aid delivery without trust is not possible

    Opinion: As seen in Gaza, aid delivery without trust is not possible

    Most Read

    • 1
      How low-emissions livestock are transforming dairy farming in Africa
    • 2
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 3
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 4
      How AI-powered citizen science can be a catalyst for the SDGs
    • 5
      WHO names new directors in ongoing restructure
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement