• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Funding
    • Opinion
    • Foreign aid

    ODA is not dead

    Growing private flows to developing countries do not make government aid irrelevant, Paul Callan, Jasmin Cooke and Andria Thomas from Dalberg Global Development Advisors write in this guest commentary.

    By Paul Callan, Jasmin Cooke, Andria Thomas // 05 December 2014
    People outside remittance centers in Malaysia. Are public aid flows becoming irrelevant? Photo by: baklavabaklava / CC BY-NC

    Many discussions on global development highlight that public aid flows to developing countries are now dwarfed by private flows in the form of foreign investments and remittances from emigrant workers. The suggestion of many commenters, either implicit or explicit, is that public aid flows are becoming irrelevant.

    Are they?

    We don’t think so. Private flows are not a substitute for aid in developing the world’s poorest countries, because private flows, as we will show, do not greatly increase the supply of public goods and services.

    We examined worldwide figures on official development assistance, remittances and foreign investment for analysis. Foreign investment and remittances do far exceed ODA, i.e., public aid, in overall amounts.

    As the figure shows, combined foreign investment and remittances in 2011 (the latest available data) were more than seven times larger than aid for all developing countries. Looking only at the least developed countries, private flows were roughly equal to official ones: Aid amounted to $45 billion in 2011, while foreign investment and remittances totaled $49 billion.

    But this comparison of total amounts does not tell the whole story. Whether this disparity makes aid irrelevant depends on what effects of financial flows you consider.

    One impact of financial flows into a country is to generate economic demand and growth. The flows act as an “economic stimulus package”: People receiving the money have more to spend, which increases the income for other people and hence their spending, and so on. For this impact, it doesn’t matter much where the money comes from, at least in the short term. Hence, private flows are indeed becoming more important than aid, even in least-developed countries, as a stimulus for increasing economic activity.

    A second impact, however, is to provide people with services, such as health, education, housing and sanitation. Remittances enable recipients to purchase these services themselves. Foreign private investments will typically result in some local employment and consequently enable employees to acquire these services as well. But only aid directly finances improvements in access to and quality of such public services.

    For example, U.S. company Procter & Gamble recently opened a new factory in Nigeria. This private investment will employ workers and likely raise their incomes. These workers and their families will be able to access improved services, either because they can afford private education or health care, or if the company provides some services directly to its workers. However, the investment will not likely have direct effects on public services for the general Nigerian public, such as upgrading schools or hiring more doctors and nurses for public clinics. By contrast, U.S. Agency for International Development support helps strengthen the country’s educational system through teacher training programs and infrastructure improvement.

    Private flows only contribute to public social services to the extent that they generate increased tax proceeds — and these are a very small share of the private flows. Foreign investments are not taxed as such; only profits and wages of workers hired are taxed. In many cases, profits on foreign investments are untaxed, and governments sometimes even subsidize foreign investment.

    According to Stephen Kosack and Jennifer Tobin, “no one is totally sure if FDI does in fact increase or decrease tax revenue.” The vast majority of remittances are not taxed, and only sales or value-added taxes on purchases with remitted funds would generate additional public revenue. If, say, 25 percent of private flows are taxed in some way, and at an average rate of 20 percent, then total taxes on private flows would be 5 percent of the flows — and it is very unlikely that many developing country governments collect even this much tax revenue on foreign investments and remittances.

    Consequently, private flows do not greatly enhance public services. They have much less of an impact on public service provision than ODA from foreign aid programs.

    Of course, it is not certain that aid flows to developing countries always result in improved social services. Aid money may be used inefficiently or incorrectly.

    Kozack and Tobin have conducted interesting statistical tests on many of these questions. They find generally that aid has some effects on human development, especially in democracies — in which presumably accountability to the public makes it more likely that aid goes to human development spending — and that foreign investment has had limited effects on human development or, perhaps more surprisingly, growth.

    In conclusion, we believe that it is not very useful to compare total amounts of official aid with total amounts of foreign investment or remittances. All three are important. Foreign investment has helped several countries escape poverty through the economic growth that successful industries bring over time. Remittances make a huge difference to the lives of the recipients. Official aid is critical for improving public services and meeting basic human development needs, and aid will remain the most important source of foreign financing for such services for a long time to come.

    Join the Devex community and access more in-depth analysis, breaking news and business advice — and a host of other services — on international development, humanitarian aid and global health.

    • Funding
    • Trade & Policy
    • Worldwide
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the authors

    • Paul Callan

      Paul Callan

      Paul Callan is Dalberg’s regional director of the Middle East and North Africa region, based in Abu Dhabi. He also co-leads Dalberg Advisors' Strategy and Performance practice area. Paul has provided advice on strategy, organizational development, design of new initiatives, and change management to many United Nations agencies, the World Bank, regional development banks, nongovernmental organizations, donors, and governments.
    • Jasmin Cooke

      Jasmin Cooke

      Jasmin Cooke is currently senior manager of global operations at Dalberg. She also served as a Dalberg strategy consultant focused on organizational efficiency, performance management and health. Prior to joining Dalberg, Cooke worked as a human capital consultant at Deloitte Consulting for two years specializing in change management.
    • Andria Thomas

      Andria Thomas

      Andria Thomas is an associate partner at Dalberg. Before joining Dalberg, she worked with the Boston Consulting Group in their Financial Services practice from their Chicago and Helsinki offices, as well as with numerous technology startups. She was also a Peace Corps volunteer in Namibia.

    Search for articles

    Related Jobs

    • Individual Consultant: Digital Trade Expert
      Phnom Penh, Cambodia | Cambodia | East Asia and Pacific | South Asia
    • Senior Procurement Manager, Ethiopia Transforming Agriculture
      RTI International
      Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | Ethiopia | Eastern Africa
    • Internship - Private Sector Fund Raising
      Colombo, Sri Lanka | Sri Lanka | South Asia
    • See more

    Most Read

    • 1
      Opinion: Mobile credit, savings, and insurance can drive financial health
    • 2
      FCDO's top development contractors in 2024/25
    • 3
      Strengthening health systems by measuring what really matters
    • 4
      Opinion: India’s bold leadership in turning the tide for TB
    • 5
      How AI-powered citizen science can be a catalyst for the SDGs

    Trending

    Financing for Development Conference

    The Trump Effect

    Newsletters

    Related Stories

    Economic DevelopmentTariffs and aid cuts jolt Africa’s growth — but the overall outlook is upbeat

    Tariffs and aid cuts jolt Africa’s growth — but the overall outlook is upbeat

    Development FinanceWhat a 3.5% tax on remittances could do to the developing world

    What a 3.5% tax on remittances could do to the developing world

    Development FinanceRemittances far outstrip foreign aid. But can they replace it?

    Remittances far outstrip foreign aid. But can they replace it?

    Devex NewswireDevex Newswire: Remittances outstrip ODA — but can they replace it?

    Devex Newswire: Remittances outstrip ODA — but can they replace it?

    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement