Opinion: US success in humanitarian response demands a bold vision

There will always be a need for the United States to provide humanitarian assistance. This need arises from national security and foreign policy drivers, but also from — yes — a fundamental American moral imperative.

Whether to stabilize in a fragile setting, help responsibly manage possible migration following a natural disaster, prevent mass starvation, slow the spread of an infectious disease, or lessen disruptions to American business markets and supply chains, having a strong U.S. humanitarian response architecture is securely in America’s interest. 

As humanitarian responsibilities shift from USAID to the State Department, we have a unique opportunity to rethink the system and create a new architecture that is smart and efficient. Below are nine key features to help ensure the U.S. has a robust humanitarian capacity. 

This article is free to read - just register or sign in

Access news, newsletters, events and more.

Join us