• News
    • Latest news
    • News search
    • Health
    • Finance
    • Food
    • Career news
    • Content series
    • Try Devex Pro
  • Jobs
    • Job search
    • Post a job
    • Employer search
    • CV Writing
    • Upcoming career events
    • Try Career Account
  • Funding
    • Funding search
    • Funding news
  • Talent
    • Candidate search
    • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Events
    • Upcoming and past events
    • Partner on an event
  • Post a job
  • About
      • About us
      • Membership
      • Newsletters
      • Advertising partnerships
      • Devex Talent Solutions
      • Contact us
Join DevexSign in
Join DevexSign in

News

  • Latest news
  • News search
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Career news
  • Content series
  • Try Devex Pro

Jobs

  • Job search
  • Post a job
  • Employer search
  • CV Writing
  • Upcoming career events
  • Try Career Account

Funding

  • Funding search
  • Funding news

Talent

  • Candidate search
  • Devex Talent Solutions

Events

  • Upcoming and past events
  • Partner on an event
Post a job

About

  • About us
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Advertising partnerships
  • Devex Talent Solutions
  • Contact us
  • My Devex
  • Update my profile % complete
  • Account & privacy settings
  • My saved jobs
  • Manage newsletters
  • Support
  • Sign out
Latest newsNews searchHealthFinanceFoodCareer newsContent seriesTry Devex Pro
    • Opinion
    • News
    • Vuvuzela

    Sounding off on the balance of autonomy and oversight of aid delivery

    With myriad restrictions, the U.S. Agency for International Development appears to be micromanaging its programs. Devex shared views on how contracts should be implemented and results evaluated.

    By Ma. Eliza Villarino // 26 February 2015
    Residents of San Jose de Ocoa, Dominican Republic help in the off-loading of USAID relief boxes during a distribution for typhoon survivors. Photo by: Juan Torres-Diaz / USAID / CC BY-NC

    Has the U.S. Agency for International Development become too controlling of the projects it funds?

    USAID has imposed myriad restrictions on how its programs are carried out, a surprising practice following its pronouncement to move away from large contracts toward grants, which by its nature should allow more autonomy in implementation, noted Diana Ohlbaum, former deputy director of the agency's Office of Transition Initiatives.

    Ohlbaum penned a seven-part series of commentaries on how to improve the effectiveness of U.S. foreign aid exclusive to Devex.

    “For sure, a degree of distance and creative tension between funder and recipient is necessary; one who is entrusted with the cost-effective, legal and proper use of taxpayer dollars has very different motives and responsibilities than one who has a vision to turn into reality. However, there is a real danger that excessive meddling can simply squash that vision,” Ohlbaum, who is also an executive committee member of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network and a principal of Turner4D, a strategic communications firm, wrote in part 1 of "Foreign aid effectiveness: A radical rethink."

    The commentary resonated with many Devex readers, who shared insights on contract implementation and debated about evaluation.

    It is very hard to strike a balance between oversight and autonomy, according to Rick van der Kamp. Allowing contracting firms to just go ahead and execute work as it sees fit assumes a level of professionalism and nonprofit orientation which is difficult to find, he said. A standard trick, he noted, is to submit a bid with an impressive lineup of experts and replace them with cheaper alternatives after winning the contract.

    One alternative, van der Kamp proposed, is issuing contract payable upon results. Such an arrangement, though, does have some drawbacks such as giving development technocrats “an awful lot of power” to peg a price for results and monitoring and evaluation experts the levers to assess success and failure.

    For reader named Usadano, aid delivery can do with less contracting and reporting constraints, with implementing partners, particularly local organizations, having more autonomy to manage programs..

    John Mpungu shared a similar view.

    “The more you let those being helped involved in what is being done the better the chances of getting buy-in and getting sustainability,” Mpungu wrote.

    He, however, emphasized that his view was not an argument for zero monitoring and accountability but that M&E rules should be mutually agreed upon and not imposed on beneficiaries. He said he favors giving contracts to local organizations with good reputation on delivery and accountability and bringing in international development agencies only to partner and transfer skills to local organisations.

    “After so many have ‘discovered’ this fundamental principle of giving help where it is needed instead of where we think it should go, I suppose we should give thanks that the aid community is, at last, catching on,” Counter2u meanwhile noted. “But the idea not to measure is dangerous if extended to outcomes and has been proven so by the failure of accountability in the U.S. government. The two ideas oppose each other. So much for that glimmer of hope.”

    How can donor agencies like USAID strike a balance between maintaining effective oversight and giving implementing partners autonomy over carrying out development programs? Join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

    Stay tuned to Devex for more news and analysis of U.S. aid, and subscribe to The Development Newswire to receive the latest from the world’s leading donors and decision-makers — emailed to you FREE every business day.

    • Trade & Policy
    Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
    The views in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect Devex's editorial views.

    About the author

    • Ma. Eliza Villarino

      Ma. Eliza VillarinoDevexElizaJV

      Eliza is a veteran journalist focused on covering the most pressing issues and latest innovations in global health, humanitarian aid, sustainability, and development. A member of Mensa, Eliza has earned a master's degree in public affairs and bachelor's degree in political science from the University of the Philippines.

    Search for articles

    Related Stories

    The future of us aidOpinion: USAID can maintain its impact amid a transition to DOS

    Opinion: USAID can maintain its impact amid a transition to DOS

    The Trump EffectWhat African experts say must change about US foreign aid

    What African experts say must change about US foreign aid

    The future of US aidScoop: USAID issues staff guidance on DEIA, foreign aid pause orders

    Scoop: USAID issues staff guidance on DEIA, foreign aid pause orders

    The Trump effectUSAID inspector general warned of oversight failures before aid shutdown

    USAID inspector general warned of oversight failures before aid shutdown

    Most Read

    • 1
      The power of diagnostics to improve mental health
    • 2
      Lasting nutrition and food security needs new funding — and new systems
    • 3
      The UN's changing of the guard
    • 4
      Opinion: Urgent action is needed to close the mobile gender gap
    • 5
      The top local employers in Europe
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Talent
    • Events

    Devex is the media platform for the global development community.

    A social enterprise, we connect and inform over 1.3 million development, health, humanitarian, and sustainability professionals through news, business intelligence, and funding & career opportunities so you can do more good for more people. We invite you to join us.

    • About us
    • Membership
    • Newsletters
    • Advertising partnerships
    • Devex Talent Solutions
    • Post a job
    • Careers at Devex
    • Contact us
    © Copyright 2000 - 2025 Devex|User Agreement|Privacy Statement